The script is so valuable Sotheby's sold it at auction for almost $100,000. Unless I am a film student and it's my homework or something. Could you give an example I could watch of the "previous" movies? It certainly would have been influencial and probably would have actually been entertaining enough at the time for it to actually stick? There's found footage films of just about every genre I can think of now short of pornography(And even then I could be wrong. I mentioned my thoughts on this in a discussion about music yesterday: "It's really impossible to make someone appreciate a work of art for it's groundbreaking qualities if the ground was already broken for a long time before they were exposed to it. But just about immediately, I was completely engrossed, and by the time the credits rolled I was convinced that its place in film history is not a misjudgment, and that it's probably even better than a lot of, especially younger, film fans seem to think. Report abuse. There are a number of cinematic techniques that were introduced in Citizen Kane including low angle shots, multiple dissolves, deep focus, non-linear storytelling (in particular supported by the film editing), people talking over one another (most films were shot then as back-and-forth dialogue), full sets with four walls and a ceiling (most films then were shot on sets like stage plays -- 3 walls, no ceiling), incorporation of fake documentary/news reels (which Welles had pioneered on radio with War of the Worlds), expressionistic lighting, and more. Ordinary citizen. Note to anyone reading: "Wells" is a typo. It was slow boring, and just all-around not worth watching. Art is, by definition, subjective. 2 films that score really high in my timelessness criteria are 12 Angry Men and Network. It offers plenty of insight. Edit 2: I realise I had been ignorant of the quality of movies before this one. There's plenty of literature on why it's a great film. It almost seemed to be used as a benchmark of moviemaking. Heralded for its technical achievements and narrative innovation, the story of fictional publishing tycoon Charles Foster Kane continues to be one of the most celebrated films of all time. You just didn't like it. Citizen Kane 1941 Google Drive mp4 . Two more examples would be The Blair Witch Project and Cloverfield. And if nobody heard it, how could anyone tell the newspaper writers what he said? Estranged from friends, lovers, and colleagues, he dies alone. I do not like almost all of his films(I'm okay with TF07. Directed by Orson Welles. Look harder than a cursory google search. A shell of his former self. Maybe it's not your speed right now. But the reason you think "What's the big deal" is because of all the techniques that Citizen Kane introduced to cinema. When a reporter is assigned to decipher newspaper magnate Charles Foster Kane's (Orson Welles) dying words, his investigation gradually reveals the fascinating portrait of a complex man who rose from obscurity to staggering heights. Once you're engaged with the story, there's so much technical mastery and innovation to take in as well. But when you point out the things it pioneered, it makes sense. But it's an amazing movie with many moments that still stick with me. /u/DoctorOddfellow still means Orson Welles, the filmmaker behind Citizen Kane and the man who adapted The War of the Worlds for radio, not H. G. Wells, the British writer who originally wrote The War of the Worlds as a book. The u/citizenkane101 community on Reddit. He tried his best to keep the movie from seeing the light of day. I think its fantastically true to life. Citizen Kane is a great movie because its a universally human story. In the midst of the worst recession since the Great Depression, Citizen Kane serves as a filter into the mind of “the American” and the dream that fuels him/her, not once shying away from the blatant contradictions that define this country’s laurels. I think it's sorta fair to say that Citizen Kane (which I enjoyed seeing for the first time last summer and I think deserves to be regarded as a great movie even without considering the techniques) is kinda the "talkie version" of Intolerance from 1916, which had a lot of influence, too, and condensed a lot of new techniques. Thanks, I realise I haven't really watched movies earlier than 1941. I suppose many of its innovations aren't clear to newcomers anymore, but its filmmaking was revolutionary. A landmark work in the history of cinema, Citizen Kane is acclaimed by many critics as the greatest movie ever made. Just as, to me, Enter The Dragon is the greatest martial arts movie. But why must we seem always compare films 'relatively' to the time, when it comes to Citizen Kane? popular-all-random-users | AskReddit-pics-funny-movies-gaming-explainlikeimfive-news-aww-todayilearned-videos-IAmA-worldnews-askscience-tifu-nottheonion-TwoXChromosomes-Jokes The type of cinematography, storytelling, acting, special/pratical effects were never done and were unthinkable to be done at that time, and after that, it was the golden rule on how to make movies. It is too gigantic, pedantic, tedious. I never understood why such a boring movie could be talked about so often and so positively. The structure of “Citizen Kane” is circular, adding more depth every time it passes over the life. Haven't films since improved on Welles ideas and methods? But aren't there films since then, and continuing today, jumping those new bars older films set just like Citizen Kane did? There are so many films released that have better acting, pacing, story, music, effects etc than Citizen Kane in the past 75 years. my subreddits. Examples existed before, but not quite like those two. This movie really changed everything about cinema in its time and I appreciate all that but if I want to watch a movie then I don't give a fuck about how and when it was shot and what difficulties they went through. The acting was okay. Citizen Kane has become a film put on such a high pedestal by movie reviewers/fans/historians, no one is allowed to touch it. However, personally I can think of a hundred movies I'd rather watch, right now, than Citizen Kane. By this I mean that the movie didn't feel dated at all. Can someone explain why is it called by some "the greatest movie ever made"? What makes it such a good movie? Also, Welles' performance is one of the most underrated things in film history. The movie opens with newsreel obituary footage that briefs us on the life and times of Charles Foster Kane; this footage, with its portentous narration, is Welles' bemused nod in the direction of the “March of Time” newsreels then being produced by another media mogul, Henry Luce. jump to content. Kane begins as an idealist but loses his way amidst the prestige and wealth. That shouldn't take away from what Citizen Kane. Most people would totally disagree that it's average though. No. I saw it when I was quite young and I really enjoyed Citizen Kane. So why is this movie so highly respected? It can be, should be, consider an icon of Hollywood.... remembered, studied and considered. Movies weren't like that until Citizen Kane, now they all are and you think they always have been. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. This makes a lot of sense because frankly after watching it I felt like I'd wasted time on something pretty unremarkable, and I too wondered why it was so highly regarded. Found Footage is just point blank a sub-genre now. Surely Citizen Kane set a new bar in the world of cinema. Watch the Trailer. Is it the acting, cinematography, sound design, etc? And it was his first film. Public reception was a little more tepid. Citizen Kane, written, produced, and directed by a young man of 25 whom America considers a genius, is an outstanding film, amazing in its presentation and vast in its conception. But just because something is built on the should of giants, doesn't mean its not being done better. It's only a matter of time). The extent of the ingenuity shown by the film Citizen Kane by Orson Welles is so vast that one cannot draw an exhaustive analysis. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. The circumstances of its making doesn't let this movie in "must watch", " time less classic" and "greatest movie ever" lists. 1.0 out of 5 stars Quite disappointing. Both of these broad examples massively changed how films could be made, but of course, nothing compared to Citizen Kane. EDIT: Thank you so much to the people who responded. Its so detailed and humanistic (eg the breakfast scenes to show the breakdown of a relationship), there's so much to relate to about human greed, power, success, relationships, reputation, purpose and meaning. The only time he was truly happy was when he was innocent, when he wasn't given everything he wanted. Thanks guys. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. It's amazing the impact that film has had on the industry, It's been a long time since I've watched Citizen Kane I should give it a go again soon. Ultimately its about the futility in the pursuit of happiness. I am honestly just wondering what different people liked and disliked about the movie to see if there is something important I missed. "The truest measure of greatness is when everything that came before you is obsolete, and everything that came after you bears your mark.". Its influence doesn't need to be forgotten. Citizen Kane didn't do very well, and neither did Touch of Evil, which was thought to be "B-Movie". Because I honestly don't know chronologically far it is from Chaplin and what would be the best non-exaggerated comparison. It's less about being the pinnacle of movie-making and more about being the start of modern movie-making. It was a nice film but somehow the pace seemed too slow for my 21st century tastes. I am not "questioning others' tastes". Thanks so much for the answer, I've always been interested in the idea of making movies. Citizen Kane : Analysis on Happiness and Money. It seems average because it set the bar for how movies should be made. I just watched Citizen Kane (1941) as it was recommended in many movie lists and I have to say I was pretty disappointed. He eventually becomes his own ruin. Today, Citizen Kane is considered by many to be one of the greatest films of all time. I am trying to see if there is anything important I missed and want to know what different people like about the movie. You can go back and watch a movie you love, and Kane would have inspired the shot style and special effects. What is it about Citizen Kane that makes it such a highly regarded movie? I presume this is because Spielberg was on set for the film and was giving Bay tips), but I've seen a lot of films copying his stuff to varying degrees. His Clerks or Bad Taste. The first time I sat down to watch Citizen Kane back when I was around 15 years old, I was just getting into film and knew that it was supposed to be amazing, but wasn't personally too excited, and thought it of it more like homework. Weren't you at all moved and affected by the Rosebud reveal, did you ponder at all on the meaning of it after the film? What impressed me the most was what I describe as its timelessness which has been a measure by which I use to judge other old films as well and this first sprang to mind when watching Citizen Kane. But in 1941 they were all almost entirely new innovations that people had never seen until Citizen Kane. Being a child of the modern age of film (and also a bit tired), I had to fight my brain a little bit to stay interested during certain parts especially given I hadn't watched any older films prior and so wasn't exactly primed to watch another. But just because something is built on the should of giants, doesn't mean its not being done better. The official screenplay for Citizen Kane is credited to Herman J. Mankiewicz and Orson Welles, but there's an ongoing rumor that Orson Welles didn't write the screenplay for Citizen Kane, which seems nuts and is hard to prove.Obviously, lots of people want to claim ownership of the idea. Press J to jump to the feed. ". Citizen Kane may be the greatest movie ever created for its time... but its not 1941 anymore. Its about a man's search for happiness, to fill the hole inside his heart. I wouldn't put this in a must watch movies list the same way I wouldn't put Model T Ford in a must buy cars list. Citizen Kane was critically well-received when it was released on May 1, 1941. Citizen Kane (1941) Directed by Orson Welles By Dan Geddes Update 4 August 2012; Originally 14 April 2001. I think back to how hilarious and edgy Steve Martin's early albums were at the time, but now they seem really tame by comparison to other comedy albums that have come out since. It's slow, sure. In contrast I found that Taxi Driver didn't have that quality. This makes sense. I venture to guess, nonetheless, that Citizen Kane will endure as a certain Griffith or Pudovkin films have “endured”—films whose historical value is undeniable but which no one cares to see again. Another good example along the lines of JP/Matrix1/Avatar would be how the language(So to speak) of action films changed after Michael Bay films came about, especially after Transformers '07. However, personally I can think of a hundred movies I'd rather watch, right now, than Citizen Kane. Both added a whole bunch of things that people have been using ever since. I've never heard an answer to this question that didn't sound pretentious, this makes total sense. It reminds me of when people dismiss LOTR for being a really tropey fantasy series. Citizen Kane 1941 Google Drive mp4-full-BDRip-M2V-Watch Citizen Kane Online Reddit-director-1941-DVD-1440p-Watch Citizen Kane Online Reddit.jpg. Help me fellow movie buffs to understand what makes Citizen Kane far superior to the Godfather. wellllllll yeah but to be picky it wasn't the first to do any of these things but it was maybe the first mainstream film to put them all together. edit subscriptions. If I'm not? That shouldn't take away from what Citizen Kane. Unlike All the President’s Men or Spotlight, Citizen Kane takes a negative view of a … Its influence doesn't need to be forgotten. Didn't you find his rise and fall fascinating? At least, happiness in materialism, social prestige, and power. Took cinema down a new path. At the time it came out, the fighting scenes were nothing like anything seen on film before. This explains a lot. Citizen Kane is an encyclopedia of techniques: a 114-minute film school which provides lesson after lesson in deep focus and rear projection, extreme close … 1941. Citizen Kane 1941 Google Drive mp4. Citizen Kane just feels like a dated picture of a time I can't relate to. It reminds me of the editing style of Casino. Reddit gives you the best of the internet in one place. I'm not a big fan of the movie myself, but technically it's quite impressive. The contract that gave birth to Citizen Kane was an unthinkable gamble by RKO, but the studio had good reason to bet on Orson Welles. Also do you believe it deserves all the praise? The plot and the dialogue seem to be relevant to a young man in 2000's and I can't even imagine how progressive they would feel for 1940's audiences. Watching Citizen Kane today, you'd think "What's the big deal?" The story was okay. The jokes were okay. Following the death of publishing tycoon Charles Foster Kane, reporters scramble to uncover the meaning of his final utterance; 'Rosebud'. Sure it's a technical marvel and invented so many techniques still used today, but those things don't exist just for the sake of existing, they work together to draw you into the film and the central mystery of who Kane really is, and what makes him tic. However, a masterpiece set in the 1940's I can identify with as the story of America. 7 people found this helpful. I heard somebody compare the now-ubiquitous cinematography traits of Kane to watching Casablanca and laughing about how that movie is filled with cinematic cliches: It is best described as a moment in time where before people knew movies in one way, and afterwards, people simply saw things differently. I googled but didn't get satisfactory results. Citizen Kane Dir. by P. Lothole: reply 21: 08/16/2015: and died = when he died. The movie can't seem to establish an atmosphere, it's always eager to jump to the next scene. Most of those things were already around bavk in silent movies even; though maybe not as condensed. At 20, he … A lot of the time when someone is talking about if a movie is good or not they'll say something along the lines of "It's no Citizen Kane or anything". Explain Like I'm Five is the best forum and archive on the internet for layperson-friendly explanations. His affair with the "singer" signifies his arrogance and deteriorating judgement. Its an incredibly well made story. THANK YOU. I hated Citizen Kane. Part of me thinks I should watch again and look for these things, most of me knows that if I felt like I waeted my time the first time I would feel even more stupid wasting my time twice. I truly appreciate your comments. If Charles Foster Kane is in itself an impressive well of treasures, the film that depicts him has a very valuable intelligence and talents. Helpful. If you think I'm nitpicking, keep in mind that the whole plot of [italic]Citizen Kane[/italic] is framed around those newspaper writers trying to ascertain the meaning of "Rosebud." Cookies help us deliver our Services. Something that I could compare it to? Hence Rosebud. With all the things that go into making a movie I can respect people who can make great movies and create things peoples wouldn't dream of seeing. Looking to watch Citizen Kane? Read more. Why question the taste of those who did? With Orson Welles, Joseph Cotten, Dorothy Comingore, Agnes Moorehead. Why do you care? Charles Foster Kane grows up … Anyways, thats only my interpretation of it. What factors make it the pinnacle of movie making? New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, News & Discussion about Major Motion Pictures, Press J to jump to the feed. Edit: I don't understand why some people are mad at me for asking this. Don't Panic! You're not taking into account that it was a lot of firsts in how it was shot, how it was acted. Citizen Kane’s central figure is Charles Foster Kane, an avatar of Hearst played by Welles. Orson Welles USA 119 min Not Rated. All of these things are so commonplace today that you'll see them in many 30-second commercials, never mind feature films. It's less about being the pinnacle of movie-making and more about being the start of modern movie-making.. Citizen Kane, American film drama, released in 1941, that was directed, produced, and cowritten by Orson Welles, who also starred in the lead role. He becomes among the most powerful men in the world, and yet he has nothing. However, when the movie Citizen Kane was released, the man who’s life inspired the film was outraged. I know I am going to be downvoted a lot for this but fuck it that's my opinion. The OP's question was about your feeling, not the detached logic of "most influential". For all the piles of research and miles of column inches that have been devoted to it, the controversy over the creative authorship of “Citizen Kane” — a kerfuffle that’s now 50 years o… If you have the means listen to the Ebert commentary. Citizen Kane had ten times the impact that those films had in people's thinking about how films could be made. Last week, I watched Citizen Kane (1941) for the first time.. How is it slow? My problem with it was that it was too fast paced. Maybe the general populace of that era wasn't so open to new film techniques, or maybe it was the constant editing and rehashing of Welles's pictures that kept audiences away from his films. By the late 1930s, when Mank was writing “Citizen Kane,” “Herman was not welcome at San Simeon because he drank a lot and Hearst didn’t want … Is the name it's built for itself deserved? Kane set a precedent for important films about mass media. As I said, they're comparable to your three SFX heavy movies examples. Find out where Citizen Kane is streaming, if Citizen Kane is on Netflix, and get news and updates, on Decider. Who wrote Citizen Kane?. If 90% of viewers of CK think it's the best ever while the other 10% thinks it garbage, then the movie is overrated to those that think it's garbage.Just because you share the majority opinion doesn't mean you're factually correct. Possible recent analogy: think about how the special effects of something like Jurassic Park or The Matrix in the 90's or maybe Avatar in 2009 changed the way that people thought about how films could be made. "If I hadn't been rich I might have been a really great man.". English. Movies are art. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the explainlikeimfive community. In Citizen Kane, director Orson Welles revolutionized how films were shot. So yes, if you watch it now, it might seem average. The They Shoot Pictures Don't They 1,000 list, which collates over 11,000 best-of lists, meanwhile, also has Citizen Kane at number one. Some credit William Randolph … If you told me that the movie was made 5-10 years ago I wouldn't find this hard to believe (accounting for obvious giveaways). "Citizen Kane" is a great period piece but at times unnecessarily melodramatic with a lot of moralizing speeches by various characters and a bit too self-conscious.
Assassin's Creed Odyssey Cheat Engine Table 2020,
Thermal Energy Project Ideas,
Santeria Funeral Customs,
Ram-line Magazine Remington 742,
Private Label Esthetician Wax,
Navy Boot Camp Address,
Peta Uk Twitter,
Rebels Mc Malta,
Deonte Brown Alabama Wiki,